Wednesday, November 1, 2017

The World Crisis in Education


"A theory that can explain anything and everything, no matter how contradictory, really isn’t science". "Evolution is not a conclusion drawn from observations. It is an ideology to which observations are applied when convenient and ignored when not". (Prof. Giertych, 1999).

https://creation.com/professor-of-genetics-says-no-to-evolution


James Tour, Ph.D another respectable and brilliant synthetic organist chemistry professor at Rice University -when referring to biochemistry experiments performed by other organic chemists- stated eloquently: 
“It is assumed,” Carell and his colleagues remark, “that life originated from a simple set of small molecules". His work dispels any such illusions. Reckless general claims are a characteristic of the field".http://inference-review.com/article/two-experiments-in-abiogenesis

Our Mission: Teach The Truth about Science


The "evolution of man" is a religious belief taught by modern day atheistic educators.  (Wells, 2002. "Evolution is, indeed, the pseudo-scientific basis of religious atheism"
"A fascinatingly honest admission by a physicist indicates the passionate commitment of establishment scientists to naturalism.
Speaking of the trust students naturally place in their highly educated college professors, this physicist said:
"I use that trust to effectively brainwash them. . . . our teaching methods are primarily those of propaganda. We appeal—without demonstration—to evidence that supports our position. We only introduce arguments and evidence that supports the currently accepted theories and omit or gloss over any evidence to the contrary".
 Another evolutionist said, "Of course, the other thing about evolution is that anything can be said because very little can be disproved. Experimental evidence is minimal". It is actually non-existent (italics ours).https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/seuforum/bb_whatpowered.htm

(Henry M. Morris, Ph.D.https://www.icr.org/article/455/)

A respectable geneticist not long ago stated:


"Having entered the battle against evolution I found myself confronted not so much by scientists as by philosophers".."Now I battle both in scientific circles and within the Church. But my activity is bringing results". "The teachers of evolution are beginning to speak in less convincing words. The offensive in support of evolution is so intensive and so well financed that it appears evolutionists are very worried". (Giertych, 1999).

So, Why do we send our kids to public and private schools ?


The Challenge to Educate our Children with True Science


We educate our children under the premise that true Science is not based on wishful thinking and obscure transitional assumptions. True science is based on truths, observed- even if unseen - time proven facts. Scholar Albert Cheng recently  published an eye opening and surprising study, where he stated:

"Students who are home schooled may attain a greater degree of self-actualization because homeschooling is highly conducive to personalized instruction and enables students to be taught a consistent worldview". 

Cheng stated further: "Second, the religious values taught in a homeschooling environment as well as in many religious private schools are consistent with political tolerance and other values necessary for a liberal democracy". https://www.theaquilareport.com/homeschooling-and-tolerance/

https://www.nheri.org/research-facts-on-homeschooling/


Percentage of students home schooled in the USA


According to the national center for education statistics, 36% of homeschooling families were primarily motivated by a desire to provide religious or moral instruction.  

Another 38% said the primary reason they homeschool is because they don’t like the school environment or the way teachers teach—those numbers are also way up from a few years ago. 


Why do so many parent opt for home-schooling their children?


Home Schooling, Distance Learning- “Produce better educational results than traditional education” Timura, M. (1995). (Perceptions of Human Resource Administrators Regarding Decisions to Support Distance Learning). However, there are other more serious and compelling reasons.

Young People today, are subjected to an enforced secularism and God-lessness throughout the entire educational system.


“Militant secularism": Is a new approach and teaching methodology embraced by the mainstream (and most) media, presently enforced in public and even some Christian schools. Today's secular education has adopted and forcefully hijacked teaching and learning through the lens of “methodological naturalism.”

It is presupposed that all faith claims are merely expressions of subjective preference. The only “true” truths are claims that are divorced from any supernatural context and impose no moral obligations on any of us.

Thus, all of us and specially our children today- without their parent's permission - are school bullied and subjected to an "enforced secularism", a blatant form of godlessness through their so called -  “accepted evolutionary theories” - they keep claiming is now a “fact". 


As an example of the above see the following textbook Textbook: Physical Science- CPO Science by Thomas C. Hsu, PhD. It is full of contradictory "evolutionary" ideas that have no place in a textbook designed for young age middle schoolers.

The idea in this textbook, as in the majority of "evolutionary" based textbooks is to control and subtly convince the young mind of our students that "evolution" is a fact.

Whereas, in reality, nothing can be farther from the truth. They mix facts, and without the student's notice, instantaneously convert from fact into allegory and wishful thinking that have nothing to do with science.

  Present Work, School and Universities Environment

The public school systems as well as some workplaces today are a “Pervasive cultural abandonment of morality". No longer do we have in place moral absolutism. The idea that we are all governed by God-directed laws and morality who has the right to govern our ethics, spiritual and moral lives.

There is a new idea of objective and moral truth. That the—ethical norms that at one time were binding on all people—is unknown to most and is rejected by the majority in our country and in our world.

Today we give honor with all our might to the rise of a fad called theism, atheism as well as secularism and evolutionary ideas. Some well founded, Christian based churches and universities are including "theistic" evolutionary teachings, and by adopting these half truths and false theories about man's creation, that are not true, are also contributing to this new moral relativism.

Some religious faiths have openly started and fanned flames of racism by publishing preposterous "evolutionary" ideas that some races are inferior to others. The facts state both biblically and genetically that humans are all equal and were created as one race. "Individuals from different populations can be genetically more similar than individuals from the same population." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1893020/“


DNA investigative results show that humans are 99.99% similar to each other. The remaining difference of .1% has to do with what makes each one of us individually special. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1416706/DNA-survey-finds-all-humans-are-99.9pc-the-same.html

Additionally, the same faith in their official web page stated: We "have no objection to credible scientific research that indicates the earth may be billions of years old." These beliefs leave wide open the opportunity for the "millions of years that "evolutionists"-inventively-but-falsely use for life to evolve on earth.

"Out of the mouth of babes" 

A brilliant eight year old, home schooler made the following remark regarding this statement (that the earth was "millions of years old"): "It makes you wonder, what was God doing all those years while the earth was sitting millions of years idle?"

Christian churches teach "theistic evolution"


Other churches and sects actively or passively teach or accept “evolutionary- theistic “ theories, the  life evolving theories that teach we all came from a cell, initially started by God, and from them we went on to becoming humans, the goo-to-human falsehood (primordial goop to human life). This is preposterous and laughable, at best.
http://www.pewforum.org/2009/02/04/religious-groups-views-on-evolution/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing_in_Biology_Makes_Sense_Except_in_the_Light_of_Evolution

Pope Francis accepts "evolution" as true


Surprisingly, even the latest Pope in 2017 has contradicted himself at times. According to Wikipedia, Pope Francis stated: "God is not a demiurge * or a magician, but the Creator who brought everything to life......Evolution in nature is not inconsistent with the notion of creation, because evolution requires the creation of beings that evolve." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation%E2%80%93evolution_controversy.

Thus, did God created humans, or did they evolve ? What did Frances really mean ?  It is obvious Pope Francis is not aware or fully convinced of the congruency between scientific and biblical facts that God made them as fully formed male and female. They did not evolve. Gen 5:2, and Mathew 10:6-9  

Other examples of this new philosophy are all over the news. “Full of self-congratulatory swagger and blasphemous bravado, pop-level atheists such as the late Christopher Hitchens” make it cool to be a non-believer or even an atheist.

Personally, when I taught at a Christian university, one of my very brilliant and very accomplished students believed that we came from a single cell created by God, but that evolution over millions of years did the rest of the human development.

“Many millennials, though mostly 20-something Caucasian males, are enamored by books and blogs run by God-hating “thinkers.” The new reality of today is : “Our new God: Tolerance be Thy name”.

Why are we allowing our children (and ourselves) to be bullied by Atheists, Theists and elegant, but logically hollow theories ?

Some Definitions


Uniformitarianism ( the concept that the earth's surface and its contents was shaped in the past by gradual processes, rather than by sudden Divine Acts).

Secularists (rejection of religion and religious considerations) rule our children's schools and learning curriculum today.

False Tolerance


Tolerance today essentially means, “Because my truth is, well, my truth, no one may ever question any behavior or belief I hold.” Haven't we all noticed that the new “standard” is now so ingrained in our country and in some of our youths that it is now impossible to biblically critique any of their beliefs or behavior without a backlash of criticism.

Some even claim they are being "judged" if we expose their evolutionary
eisegesis ("the process that.. introduces one's own presuppositions, agendas, or biases"), their false reasoning and circular logic. You are now classified as anti-humanist, “imposing your religious views”, xenophobic, and all the other “phobic” adjectives that you can find in the dictionary if you question, defend your truth based scientific beliefs, and or oppose their radical and “freedom” thinking views.

The last decade and for much longer (2008-2017) the president of the United States, the government and some religious leaders have put "political correctness" ahead of scientific and biblical accuracy in our minds and hearts.

Alex McFarland, a Director for Christian World view and Apologetics at North Greenville University stated in his latest book: “Abandoned Faith: Why Millennials Are Walking Away and How You Can Lead Them Home.”  (McFarland, 2017), said the following:

”Is it really any wonder that kids raised in the churches of 21st century America aren’t often stirred to lifelong commitment? Most churches are so occupied with “marketing” themselves to prospective attendees that they wouldn’t dream of risking their “brand” by speaking tough-as-nails truth”.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/04/30/ten-reasons-millennials-are-backing-away-from-god-and-christianity.html

Secular and Godless philosophies are the order of the day.

It has been estimated that over two million children are currently home-schooled in the United States alone. Additionally there is an estimated 500,000 to one million children more that are being educated at home worldwide.

Home-schooled students have proven their capabilities in colleges and beyond the obvious. Many teachers have been privileged to have university home schooled students in science and math classes that excelled beyond those who went to public school.

Despite this track record of success by home schooled children, some home-schooling parents, we are told, feel intimidated by the incoherent, erratic, and inconsistent claims that evolution is a proven fact and has to be taught in school as an essential foundation for their future success.

One very reputable and conservative home school web site wrote back to a concerned parent who asked them why they were teaching false science. They responded via email that it was up to the children (6 and 8 years old) to decide for themselves whether "evolution" was true or not. Therefore, they included it their science curriculum. How absurd. Surprisingly, that home school program apparently took away the "evolutionary" subject after that parent complained.

If we can falsely and easily convince our university adult students that "evolution of man" is true, how do you expect your 8 and 6 year old child to be capable of detecting the truth from falsehoods ?
(Henry M. Morris, Ph.D.https://www.icr.org/article/455/)

This is particularly a worry for parents and or students who desire careers in the sciences and medicine. One lecturer and solid creation teacher stated: “Should Christian homeschooling parents believe the intimidating rhetoric of vocal theistic evolutionists who vigorously seek to get Christians to compromise Scripture and adjust it to fit into evolutionary paradigms?”

The lecturer ads, “When Christian parents compromise on scriptural truth by twisting it to make it fit with the claims of evolution regarding abiogenesis (that life arose from non-being, non-intelligent origins- from nothing, or even a single cell- Italics ours), the rise of biological complexity, and the age of the earth and universe, they risk causing irreparable, faith-damaging harm to their own children”.

In fact it has been shown that most medical doctors and most medical schools continue to consider evolution to be fairly irrelevant and useless to their practice. The objective facts of biology make perfect sense without any evolutionary overlays.

Shamefully, secular education and their evolutionists priests, not satisfied with the fact that their UN-proven theory is being forced at early ages of children who have no idea what they are being taught, whether right or wrong, are now intent on forcing their naturalistic, UN-goldly, make-no-sense, UN-intelligent, mindless beliefs into the medical field.

Blinded by the facts in the Chemistry field 

Coincidences of the gases balance in the Atmosphere



For instance, take Nitrogen (N2), Oxygen (O2), and Ozone Layer (O3). These gases are designed to be and located at the perfect altitude on earth. These elements are placed there in order to defuse Gamma, X-rays, and Ultra-Violet rays as they hit our planet. (Plourde, 2014).

They are there for a specific and specially DESIGNED purpose so they can protect life on earth. All these rays are harmful radiation that come with high, intermediate, and moderate energy rays that would kill us were it not for those double and triple covalent compounds (Nitrogen, O2 and O3) respectively and strategically designed and put there. Not by chance.


Another "Coincidence

 

 "The electron's electrical charges

 

Take another "coincidence". If the electron's negative charge of the atom was different by even ONE billionth of 1% from the proton's positive charge, the resulting electro physical imbalance in the atoms would cause any sizable amount of matter in the universe to instantaneously explode (Dr. Jay L. Wile. 2007, Pg 316)

Thus, Chemistry, an important integral in the medicine field, axiomatically teaches us there was an Intelligent Designer. Nonetheless, an article on the Boston Globe under the misnomer of : “Brainiac. Illuminating thoughts from the world of ideas”, said in one of their blogs:

“There are signs that medicine is moving in the direction of evolutionary thinking. Both the revised Advanced Placement Biology curriculum and the new version of the MCAT, which debuts in 2015, will feature more questions about evolution".

"And Arizona State University, the University of California, San Francisco, and the University of California, Los Angeles all now have centers devoted to evolutionary medicine”. (Sources: “Evolution in medical school: Do we need more of it?” http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2013/04/a_movement_to_m.html).

Why we are teaching our Children the Truth instead of "bad theories"  (See:Professor Jerome Lejeune, comments)

True evidence, is not based on false hypothesis and "Bad theories"


Any theory that tries to combine the evolutionary time frame with creation contradicts human logic, experimental and true science. It defies the mind and reasonableness. It just doesn't make sense, AT ALL. All evidence points to an explosion (such as the Cambrian explosion) of life that "evolutionists" can not possibly explain with their "millions of years of evolution".

"In 2001, staunch evolutionist Ernst Mayr wrote the following":
“ Given the fact of evolution, one would expect the fossils to document a gradual steady change from one ancestral form to the descendants. But this is not what the paleontologist finds. Instead, he or she finds gaps in just about every phyletic series. New types often appear quite suddenly, and their immediate ancestors are absent in the geological strata. The discovery of unbroken series of species changing gradually into descending species is very rare. Indeed the fossil record is one of discontinuities, seemingly documenting jumps (saltations) from one type of organism to a different type. This raises a puzzling question: Why does the fossil record fail to reflect the gradual change one would expect from evolution? http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution_and_the_fossil_record

False Facts and obsolete teachings


Rice University through OpenStax, a free on line study resource, in one of its biology lessons stated:  "Archaeopteryx and Xiaotingia, for example, were flying dinosaurs and are believed to be early precursors of birds".
https://cnx.org/contents/GFy_h8cu@10.115:E4i-YQIZ@7/Breathing

However, evolutionist Dr. Alan Feducia, contradicted that statement by saying: "one of the more famous alleged transitional fossils claimed by evolutionists is Archaeopteryx", and bluntly stated:

“ 'Paleontologists have tried to turn Archaeopteryx into an earth-bound, feathered dinosaur. But it’s not. It is a bird, a perching bird. And no amount of ‘paleobabble’ is going to change that". (Emphasis added)
(Source: Dr. Jonathan Sarfati, P.H.D., F.M., Archaeopteryx (unlike Archaeoraptor) is NOT a hoax — it is a true bird, not a “missing link”)
  
Another medical doctor's statement

Dr David Menton also stated  that Archaeopteryx is a true bird with flight feathers, not a transitional form—and certainly not a feathered dinosaur. 
http://creation.com/archaeopteryx-unlike-archaeoraptor-is-not-a-hoaxit-is-a-true-bird-not-a-missing-link 


Obviously, OpenStax's contributor, has not read the latest facts, or is misinformed.  (Image courtesy of Steve Cardno at www.genesis.com-http://creation.com/archaeopteryx-unlike-archaeoraptor-is-not-a-hoaxit-is-a-true-bird-not-a-missing-link)

Another professor states:
"As a forester, I study populations of trees and breed more productive ones..... I found it necessary to play down the evolutionary explanations given in textbooks, for the simple reason that I find no evidence to support them. In fact, it was my teaching of population genetics, coupled with the discovery that my children are being taught evolution in secondary school on the claim that population genetics provides evidence for it, that made me enter the debate publicly". https://creation.com/professor-of-genetics-says-no-to-evolution
"I started reading the current literature on the topic of Evolution. Until then I was not aware how shaky the evidence for Evolution was, how much of what was "evidence" had to be discarded, how little new evidence had been accumulated over the years, and how very much ideas dominate facts. These ideas have become dogma, yet they have no footing in natural sciences. They stem from materialistic philosophies".

"Thus what is referred to as micro-evolution represents natural or artificial reduction of the gene pool. You will not get Evolution that way. Evolution means construction of new genes. It means increase in the amount of genetic information, and not reduction of it". ....Thus there is no evidence for Evolution here".
http://www.theotokos.org.uk/pages/creation/gjkeane/foreword.html

Other horse and human evolution false statements in OpenStax


A few pages later Openstax openly endorses evolution again as if it is a proven fact when, under fossils subheading, it says: "For example, scientists have recovered highly detailed records showing the evolution of humans and horses."
 "https://cnx.org/contents/GFy_h8cu@10.115:noBcfThl@7/Understanding-Evolution

Nevertheless, Dr Niles Eldredge, curator of the American Museum of Natural History boldly, in stark contradiction to Openstax assertions, states:  "I admit that an awful lot of that [imaginary stories] has gotten into the textbooks as though it were true. For instance, the most famous example still on exhibit downstairs [in the American Museum] is the exhibit on horse evolution prepared perhaps 50 years ago. That has been presented as literal truth in textbook after textbook. Now I think that that is lamentable.."  https://answersingenesis.org/evidence-against-evolution/whats-happened-to-the-horse/

Peter Hastie, writing on this subject then said. "The largest horse today is the Clydesdale; the smallest is the Fallabella, which stands at 43 centimetres (17 inches) tall. Both are members of the same species, and neither has evolved from the other".

Hastie concluded. "Why do science textbooks continue to use the horse as a prime example of evolution, when the whole schema is demonstrably false? Why do they continue to teach our kids something that is not scientific?" Evolutionists use lies and or misinformation in order to win the hearts of our children.

On Natural Selection and Mutations


"Natural Selection" is NOT evolution, as much as "devolution" as it limits the gene pool and degrades and or ultimately limits the "selection". http://creationwiki.org/Devolution. U.S National Library of Medicine states, Gene mutations "prevent one or more of these proteins from working properly". When changing a gene’s instructions in order to make a protein, a mutation can cause that protein to malfunction and or to be missing entirely."

When a mutation alters a protein that plays a critical role in the body, it can disrupt normal development or cause a medical condition. A condition caused by mutations in one or more genes is called a genetic disorder." https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/mutationsanddisorders/mutationscausedisease

Mutations do not lead to upward and improved genetics. Instead they lead the way to damaged genes, in other words "devolution", and extinction, not "evolution". 'Genetic mutations cause flaws in the genetic code. They don’t add new information, they simply alter existing information . . .  in almost all situations'. " Furthermore, "..most mutations result in corruption of information".(https://answersingenesis.org/charles-darwin/the-true-origin-of-the-species/)

Caricature courtesy of www.answeringenesis.com





"We have observed the change in dogs over time, but that doesn’t mean that evolution has occurred. You can breed wolves to get to chihuahuas, but you can’t breed chihuahuas to get wolves—variation in the genetic information has been lost. Darwin used this type of change as (false)evidence without an understanding of the limits of genetic change that are known today. (Italics ours) (Courtesy of on . https://answersingenesis.org/natural-selection/natural-selection-vs-evolution/

When speaking of "beneficial" mutations "There is nothing to support any information gain at all. But evolution posits that the information content of the simplest living organisms, the mycoplasma with 580,000 ‘letters’ (482 genes), was (miraculously) increased to...the 3 billion (genes) letters equivalent (and needed) in man. If this were so, we should be able to observe plenty of examples of information gain without intelligent input. But we have yet to observe even one.")(Italics ours)  http://creation.com/is-antibiotic-resistance-really-due-to-increase-in-information

Dr. Gary Parker, a biology professor states:
"Each variety resulting from reproductive isolation has a smaller gene pool than the original and a restricted ability to explore new environments with new trait combinations or to meet changes in its own environment. The longterm result? Extinction would be much more likely than evolution". ( Professor Gary Parker is a biology teacher who received his PhD in biology with geology at Ball State University, USA.) http://www.theevolutioncrisis.org.uk/testimony5.php

Other true geneticists and scientist seriously question and downplay the truth about evolution

 
What other true geneticists are saying

Jerome LeJenune  a French geneticist who discovered the abnormality in humans that causes Down syndrome said:

"We have no acceptable theory of evolution at the present time. There is none; and I cannot accept the theory that I teach to my students each year. Let me explain. I teach the synthetic theory known as the neo-Darwinian one, for one reason only; not because it’s good, we know it is bad, but because there isn’t any other. Whilst waiting to find something better you are taught something which is known to be inexact, which is a first approximation …"

The "theory" of "evolution" as taught in our schools is a SCAM and is FALSE, it is BAD. It is full of inconsistent "facts" that add up to NOTHING. It is elegant but empty. It is not cohesive. It is a badly designed hypothesis. It is a collections of wishes, and eisegesis based terminology, that uses beautiful true science to poorly, but elegantly manipulate man's twisted and crafty ideas in order to ultimately teach false science. It comes from Atheists, and Theists, not from true science.

(Eisegesis is the process of interpreting a text or portion of text in such a way that the process introduces one's own presuppositions, agendas, or biases into and onto the text"). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisegesis.This is the true agenda of theists, secularists and "evolutionists".

Regardless of how well funded by the National Science Foundation and other government sites may be, their findings appear elegant and "almost" true, but in reality are full of empty substance, whose research and findings ultimately and actually point to the Creator, The God of the Bible as being the origin of Life. A well respected evolutionist and paleontologist once shamed the evolutionist world in a lecture to his colleagues in New York City. 

"While he was yet the internationally respected senior paleontologist at the British Museum, Colin Patterson4 stunned the scientific world by calling evolution an “anti-theory” that generates “anti-knowledge”—a concept full of explanatory vocabulary that actually explains nothing and that even generates a false impression of what the facts are". http://members.iinet.net.au/%7Esejones/pattam01.html
 https://answersingenesis.org/biology/homology-comparative-similarities/


God's fingerprints are all over the Universe. Gen 1:1 (see also http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.4161/cc.8.18.9536)

What about the fossil record ?


The view that the earth (and its “fossil record”) is hundreds of millions of years old is highly questioned by reputable scientists, and the idea that we were formed in those hundreds of millions of years is FALSE. Geologic systems are far from certain and riddled with contradictions.
(See also Radiometric Dating: Back to Basics.)
https://answersingenesis.org/geology/radiometric-dating/radiometric-dating-back-to-basics/ 

"No real evolutionist, whether gradualist or punctuationalist, uses the fossil record in favor of the theory of evolution as opposed to special creation" (Ridley, M New Scientist 90:832 1981) 

Evolutionary ideas need a major rethink

A Nature News article in 2004 asked a profound question, “Does evolutionary theory need a major rethink?” 

One group of scholars said, “Yes, urgently.”   The other group reassured readers not to worry, asserting, “No–all is well.” This means that Darwin’s unique ideas, which serve as the core of evolutionary theory, are coming in for brutal questioning. “Perhaps haunted by the spectre of intelligent design, evolutionary biologists wish to show a united front to those hostile to (evolutionary) science.”(Italics ours)[1]
 https://crev.info/2017/05/darwin-design-art-shocked/

Can a single cell be re-Created ?


Evolutionists and practicing scientists are attempting to create life from a single cell. However, they will never find spontaneous, already coded information, in any single cell, the same way it was originally coded for the "irreducible complexity" of those complex mechanisms. They will never discover an already programmed carefully detailed information  coding system like the DNA structure of even a simplest living cell along with its chemical and physical "irreducible complexity". NOT "in billions of years".

You can not be a limper of two (2) opinions ! You can not believe in a single cell evolution - that God is an Impotent, and Handicapped person, while being Almighty at the same time. Would you leave an invention or design half way finished?
1 Kings 18:21"How long will you hesitate between two opinions?

Even many of the most physically challenged persons finish what they start and become incredibly successful. Why would God be less apt? https://successstory.com/inspiration/10-best-successful-personalities-with-disabilities


The most reliable textbook ever written says: You can not believe in "Jesus, the Last Adam", if there was no "First Adam" to begin with. (1Cor 15:45). This time proven age wise, but surprisingly modern textbook doesn't mince words, it does NOT state "The First Cell". It is perfectly clear when it spells out: "The First Adam". New Living Translation

"The first man, Adam, became a living person." (Not a living cell !) (Italics ours.) 1 Cor 15:45

"The origin of life is an especially difficult problem for materialists. Some of the remaining mysteries include the origin of ribose, the origin of nucleotides, the origin of amino acids, the origin of optically pure monomers, the polymerization of monomers, the ordering of monomers into biochemically meaningful arrangements, and so on".

"Life today is based on the information-carrying molecules DNA and RNA, the catalytic action of enzymes, and structural proteins. Life is self-perpetuating. The simplest cells known have biochemical machinery that can store and retrieve information encoded in DNA, transcribe the information into RNA, and then translate the RNA into a sequence of amino acids to make enzymes and other proteins as shown in the diagram in Figure 1."


"DNA is transcribed into messenger RNA with the assistance of an enzyme called RNA polymerase inside the cell nucleus. The messenger RNA is transported to the ribosome, a protein factory outside the nucleus. The RNA strand is there translated into a sequence of amino acids to form a protein. Some proteins are enzymes, such as RNA polymerase."

Proteins then, is what ultimately converts our cells into the respective complex organs, the heart, the lungs, the incredible eye, the ear, bones, blood. Ultimately making us what we are, very complex humans. Which one came first? The blood cells, the lungs, the heart, the liver? Or did all at the same time come at once? Could anything have survived without all of those "irreducible complex" organs?

 An un-intelligent, origin of life scenario needs to explain the origin of this incredible complex information processing system. There is not enough "millions of years". Evolution is out of the question. Even the simplest cell could not have spontaneously sprung from nothing with all that intricate information system built-in. Much less that of an intricately and exponentially complex human cell !

(Quote and Image, a courtesy of http://tasc-creationscience.org/ http://tasc-creationscience.org/content/has-science-found-how-life-began-and-species-evolved-examination-rna-world-hypothesis-and.)


A "simple" human cell


Human cell image courtesy of: commons.wikimedia.org

What about "Junk DNA"?
There is NO "Junk DNA" (a misnomer) as some, naively want us to believe. (https://www.encodeproject.org/  
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26222789)
" TEs (Transposable elements or "junk DNA) (are) factors necessary for making us human rather than just selfish sequences or obligatory guests invading our DNA."  (Italics ours). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26222789.

" McClintock..., was  among the first researchers to suggest that these mysterious mobile elements of the genome might play some kind of regulatory role, determining which genes are turned on and when this activation takes place (McClintock, 1965)." https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/Transposons-or-Jumping-Genes-Not-Junk-DNA-1211.

Thus, new discoveries are alerting scientists to think twice before dismissing such a large portion of the genome as nothing but "junk."


In 2012 it was reported that 80% or more of our DNA seems to play some functional role, according to published findings of the multi-national project ENCODE  (Encyclopedia of DNA Elements). 

Dozens of technical scientific papers, published in 2007 and 2012, have caused a huge uproar, to the point "that they have set in motion a major rethinking of how widely our DNA is opened, read, and used".https://crev.info/2017/05/darwin-design-art-shocked/

Recently, the leader of the ENCODE project, Ewan Birney, is predicting that the human genome will soon prove to be 100% functional.
 Ed Yong, “ENCODE: the Rough Guide to the Human Genome,” http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/09/05/encode-the-rough-guide-to-the-human-genome/#.V_AxDtx4yoI.

Thus, the teachings of "evolution" and the misnomer "Junk DNA" have proven to be false. This new finding is no imagination, nor "story telling". It is true science.

 

Is "Evolution then, a Fact ?


Professor Giertych said:

“I oppose the theory of evolution as a scientist, a geneticist, and not on religious grounds. I have no problem with creation being achieved through evolution were it not for the fact that scientific evidence points against the theory of evolution. It points to a young earth (several thousands years old) and to the impossibility of getting improvements, new functions and new organs by a natural process. It shows that we observe devolution (loss of information, extinctions, increase of the genetic load – not of defective genes in populations) and no positive mutations.”
https://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090507163211AABaT7p

Regarding mutations and breeding work on forest trees


Giertych states,
"All of this work has long since been abandoned. It led nowhere. All that was obtained were deformed freaks, absolutely useless in forestry".

Maybe occasionally some oddity could be of ornamental value, but never able to live on its own in natural conditions. A glance through literature on mutations outside forestry quickly convinced me that the pattern is similar everywhere. Mutations are either neutral or detrimental. Positive ones, if they do occur, are too rare to be noticeable. Stability in nature is the rule. We have no proofs for Evolution from mutation research.

"No. Genetics has no proofs for Evolution. It has trouble explaining it. The closer one looks at the evidence for Evolution, the less one finds of substance. In fact, the theory keeps on postulating evidence and failing to find it, and moves on to other postulates (fossil missing links, natural selection of improved forms, positive mutations, molecular phylogenetic sequences, etc.). This is not science". 
 
Professor Maciej Giertych,
B.A., M.A. Oxon, Ph.D. Toronto, D.Sc. Poznan
Polish Academy of Sciences,
Institute of Dendrology,
62-035 Kornik, Poland
http://www.theotokos.org.uk/pages/creation/gjkeane/foreword.html

 

 

Information Systems Require an Intelligent Programmer


The source of living beings is the information system and not just the purely chemical or physical characteristics of their makeup.
Without spontaneous information pre-programmed into the DNA, scientists will never be able to replicate the marvelous process instituted into a haploid human cell with with its 3.5 billion base pairs. (http://www.edinformatics.com/math_science/human_genome.htm)

There is not enough “millions of years” as claimed by evolutionists, for the miracle of life with its information system in the DNA molecules, for life to have occurred from nothing. Their pursuits will be used for other useful things, but never to prove that we came from a non-existing being.

Just as you will never be able to convince any Computer or IT Scientist that a pile of silicon, metal, plastic material, gold, and wires would self create into an IBM mainframe computer or even a lowly, humble laptop in a period of 4 and ½ billion years via chemical reactions, physical reactions, and millions of volts of electrical discharges. Would you ? Or could you successfully convince anyone with a fairly intelligent level that such an intellectual accomplishment came from a Big Bang?

The Iphone: An invention by Chance?


What about your Iphone. Did not Steve Jobs and others create and co-create the Iphone you hold in your hands?

Respectfully Steve Jobs is not here today, but would anyone dare say that because he is not present, that his invention did not take place by him and others? That he didn't design or help design it?

That his invention was simply a pure chance of his imagination? Worse yet, that is was in the making through millions of years and that it came about by a simple chance of millions of volts of applied electricity and a goop of silicon material that haphazardly came together in an obscure lab at Silicon Valley?

That would not be a very respectful nor honoring way of remembering a brilliant, intelligent person, engineer and inventor.
Well meaning scientists and or chemists may one day be able to re-produce a simple replica (or even a complex replica) of the DNA and or the chemical composition of a single or multiple cells. However, that would simply mean that it took someone INTELLIGENT with a very sharp sense of ability, education, training and mathematical ability to re-create life.

A re-creation of life is just what the word means: Re-CREATION.
It would have taken the incredibly arduous effort, preparation, scholarly study, huge amount of knowledge and the relentless work of an INTELLIGENT person to get to that point. Unless we take away the credit of that brilliant chemist or physicist no one would dare claim that theirs was not an intelligent accomplishment but a simple matter of mindless “chance”.

"Just as phosphorus, glass and copper will work together in a television set only if properly arranged by human engineers, so DNA (with its  ATP- Adenosine triphosphate) and protein will only work in productive harmony if properly ordered by an outside creative agent". (Gary Parker, PhD).

Evolutionary biologist Eugene Koonin, calculated the "probability of a simple replication-translation system, just one key component, to be less than 1 chance in 10^1,018 making it unlikely that life will ever spontaneously self-assemble anywhere in the universe."https://evolutionnews.org/2017/06/could-atheism-survive-the-discovery-of-extraterrestrial-life/

Life comes from an intelligent source. Life does not come from far fetched chasm jumping “hoping and wishing” over millions of years of chemical reactions, or physical reactions that evolutionists blindly use for their attempt to go from primordial soup goo- to- humans. (Darwin Flubber)

If Creation is a Religion, so is Evolution 

The Universe Forum which is part of NASA's Education Support Network stated in one of its reputable web pages: "No one yet knows what happened at the instant of the Big Bang - or what came before. What powered the Big Bang? Where did all the stuff in the universe come from in the first place? What was the universe like just before the Big Bang?"
 https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/seuforum/bb_whatpowered.htm

In other words no one knows the origin of this phenomena. It is based on guess-work and more accurately on blind faith. However, when Christians reply that they don't know the origin of an Intelligent Creator, they are accused of being religious and naively believing in "blind faith".

The difference between these two "naive" beliefs is that we see evidence of an Intelligent Creator, Rom 1:20.  but we do not have a single evidence that the "Big Bang" ever happened.  https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/seuforum/bb_whatpowered.htm. It is like saying to your friend standing next to you: "We have no idea if the IPhone actually exists" as you answer an incoming call on the latest version of Apple's IPhone.

Evolution is a false religion that is taught in schools as "science". The "magic" of millions of years and millions of accidental "natural selections" or goo-to-you evolution is held out as an explanation of creation.

What about the Big Bang "Theory" and the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) ?


 The Cosmic Microwave Background, CMB radiation theory that "testifies" to this Big Bang theory is being constantly questioned by new findings. The Cosmic Microwave Background, CMB radiation theory that "testifies" to the 13.5 billion years of our universe is being constantly challenged by many credible scientists (apparent anomalies, if found to be of cosmological origin, will pose a big challenge to the standard model of cosmology).

"More work has to be done to find a proper approach to modify the effects of imbalanced differential observations and recover a corrected temperature map.

 Further study of the errors in WMAP temperature and noise fluctuation maps caused by the observation inhomogeneity and imbalance is obviously required".

https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/398/1/47/1092479/Observation-number-correlation-in-WMAP-data

Another paper on "STATISTICAL CHALLENGES IN THE ANALYSIS OF COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND RADIATION" said,

"According to the standard cosmological model, the Universe that we currently observe originated approximately 13.7 billion years ago in a very hot and dense state, in what of course is universally known as the Big Bang. Neglecting fundamental physics in the first fractions of seconds, we can naively imagine a fluid state where matter was completely ionized..".

"These datasets are a goldmine of information for Cosmology and Theoretical Physics; their efficient exploitation posits several intriguing challenges from the statistical point of view. ..In this paper we review a number of open problems in CMB data analysis and we present applications to observations from the WMAP mission"

https://ia800900.us.archive.org/7/items/arxiv-0807.1816/0807.1816.pdf
For a more detailed discussion on the CMB please go to this link: https://creationhomeschooler.blogspot.com/p/what-about-cmb-has-it-proven-big-bang.html

 

 When everything else fails, just throw in the "Millions" if not a few Billions of Years


Thus, evolution theories leave that part up to you to figure out with your imagination via the millions of years of time line. Evolution theories always add the "magic mix" of millions of years idea to the explanation of un-intelligent creation. The most reliable textbook ever written doesn't waiver, it unequivocally states: In the Sixth Day, [Someone]-God created humans.

(Then God said, “And now we will make human beings ; they will be like us and resemble us. They will have power over the fish, the birds, and all animals, obdomestic and wild,[d] large and small.” 27 So God created human beings, making them to be like himself. He created them male and female, .. Evening passed and morning came—that was the sixth day".) Gen 1:26

No ! this Creator did NOT create a single cell to find its way through "millions of years of mutations". Would you start to design and implement any thing, a computer, a TV, a car, a bridge, a sumptuous meal for your neighbor to finish it , or start anything, and then leave it for "luck" to get it done?
 
That's NOT what the Bible says. God is not lazy. God, the Creator,  like you and us intelligent persons likes to get things done, and finish what He starts !. So will My word be which goes forth from My mouth; It will not return to Me empty, Without accomplishing what I desire, And without succeeding in the matter for which I sent it. Isa 55:11

The motivation to leave God out of the picture.


If everything came about by natural processes—without a Creator, or a God in the picture—then, we don't owe anything to this Creator. He does not own us and has no right to tell us how to live.
In fact, it has been said: “God does not really exist in this way of thinking, so there is no absolute basis for morality.” https://answersingenesis.org/dinosaurs/when-did-dinosaurs-live/what-really-happened-to-the-dinosaurs/. Single cell "evolution" could have never assured success in the matter of life as it exists today. Evolution teaching is FALSE !  And, We will NOT teach this to our children ! http://gootoyou.com/

True Wisdom in True Science


Astronomy and the Laws of Physics

Danny R. Faulkner, PhD who earned graduate degrees in physics and astronomy and taught at the University of South Carolina Lancaster for over 26 years said in one his lectures :“The God issue is not an intellectual one but rather one issue of the heart”.

Indeed, despite the FACT that we have all the evidence to show that a Creator, The God of the Bible was the originator of life, it is self-evident that, “The God issue is not an intellectual one but rather one issue of the heart”.

Psalms 14:1 says it gently but decisively. “ The fool says in his heart, "There is no God." Let us teach our children the wisdom from above, the God like wisdom that will make them successful and respectful citizens of a non- God like world.

That is why the Bible encourages, "You shall teach them to your sons (and daughters, italic ours), talking of them when you sit in your house and when you walk along the road and when you lie down and when you rise up. "You shall write them on the door posts of your house and on your gates”. Deuteronomy 11:19,20. Does this sound like the majority of our teaching must take place from home? Even, if circumstance demand we have to send our children to public schools, our home teaching moments must be based on the best textbook ever written, the Bible.

 

Home-Schooling or home training in a Godly way is the answer. Heb 4:12


We are doing fine by teaching our children God's Wisdom and true Science at home (home schooling) in a way that never contradicts the Bible - the most reliable textbook.

The Truth we teach is that Life's origin and its intricate mechanisms are evident in the Chemistry, Physics, Astronomy, Genetics, Biology, Geology, the human cell and its miraculous DNA structure. That all of this is the product of an Intelligent person, A Creator.

Chemistry with its orderly Table of Elements points to an intelligent creator, inventor, originator. It is predictable not chaotic as "evolution" demands over "millions of years".

Order does not come from disorder. Thermodynamics 2nd law does not change for evolutionists. Neither do Entropy laws change over millions of years. They are both laws that support Creation, not "evolution".

We are going from order to disorder, (in a closed or open system) not the contrary as "evolutionists" want to trick us into believing.

 "There are no known violations of the second law of thermodynamics. Ordinarily the second law is stated for isolated systems, but the second law applies equally well to open systems", Dr John Ross of Harvard University
http://creation.com/the-second-law-of-thermodynamics-answers-to-critics

Every Finger Print is Unique 


Astronomy, Galaxies and the Stars 

Physics with its orderly laws apply both to the micro and to macro creation. Atoms and Solar systems all point to the same Mind, the same Creator.

 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Solar_System
Photo Credit: Greg Robson, Creative Commons License
https://www.thoughtco.com/atoms-diagrams-electron-configurations-elements-4064658

"Simple models show electrons orbiting the nuclear in a near-circular orbit, like planets orbiting a star, but real behavior is much more complex" https://www.thoughtco.com/basic-model-of-the-atom-603799

Astronomy points to a brilliant omniscient, all Powerful Creator. There are more stars in the universe than there are grains of sand on Earth.

"There are 5 to 10 times more stars than there are grains of sand on all the world’s beaches". https://www.universetoday.com/106725/are-there-more-grains-of-sand-than-stars/

Would you trust someone who teaches your children that all of these things came about from nothing? That there is no similarity or no commonality?

Would you trust your children being deceived into thinking that their future lies on waiting, if they can only wait a few millions of years to succeed?

We do not trust "evolutionists" with the teaching and training of your children. They do not teach logic. They teach rhetoric and made up stories.

Would you trust less informed teachers, even well meaning instructors with Ph.D's to educate your children with hypothesis, theories and fables that took place "millions of years ago", instead of true science that teaches that all things are the products of laws and consequence of someone's work, from an INTELLIGENT originator?

For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. (Newton's Third Law of Physics.). God is the First Action that created all things. He is the First Source of energy. Energy can never be destroyed or created, it can only be exchanged. God's energy is the source of all Humans and all living creatures. 

Would you trust a system and their educators that indoctrinate our children that their work and their ULTIMATE success depends on chance. That perhaps after innumerable tries, they may just succeed just as man's arrival to the world took place over "millions and millions of years"?

“The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom: a good understanding have all they that do his commandments" Proverbs 14:8

Thus, it is imperative that we should teach ourselves and our children The Truth about science.
 "You shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, when you walk by the way, when you lie down, and when you rise up." https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+6%3A7&version=NKJV


Thus, “From all the money and time lavished on the ...(many) ‘Evolution’ series (and teachings), major articles in science journals, and political campaigns to keep teachers from presenting alternatives to evolution in schools, it is evident that the evolutionists fear the increasing spread of creationist information, despite their best efforts at censorship”.

They "are desperate to counteract this information. But their efforts don’t withstand (True) scientific scrutiny, and in the end any reasonable observer would have to admit that evolution is a deduction from a materialistic belief system.  

It is philosophy/religion dressed up as ‘science.” http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-2-chapter-12-argument-evolution-of-mankind. (italics,ours)

"For the wisdom of this world is foolishness in God’s sight.  “He catches the wise in their craftiness.” 1Cor 3:19

We heartily hope this essay will help homeschooling and all parents with the encouragement needed to understand and defend the biblical record of a full human creation, thus fending off the pseudo-science of theistic and atheistic evolution.

We are determined to teach our children True Science - NOT "Story Telling" unproven imaginary propaganda.

Home schooling is the best avenue to teach honesty, truth and facts. If home schooling is not possible, then home based Biblical education is the next best path.

 http://www.worldofmoms.com/articles/why-home-schooling-is-better-than-traditional-schooling/666/4

Conclusion


We conclude our essay with the following statement by Dr. Nathaniel T. Jeanson and Jeffrey P. Tomkins:

“If evolutionists want to be taken seriously in the origins debate, then they need to do more than make an isolated claim about an obscure species here and there that shows nothing but shifts in existing genetic variation or an isolated benefit due to the loss of genetic information.

Instead, they need to give us a comprehensive model, a falsifiable explanation that accounts for the genetics of all species alive today. Science demands no less.” https://answersingenesis.org/creation-scientists/mainstream-scientific-literature-ignore-young-earth-conclusions/

Therefore, we remain committed to true science and research as the beginning of this article forcefully stood for.


The laws of Physics are infallible. The laws of Chemistry are orderly. The laws of Biology can not deny an orderly process. The laws of Information and DNA structure demand an original, intelligent programmer.

The laws of Thermodynamics require order instead of chance (First and Second Law).

On their own they defend an orderly fully formed Living Person (Not a Cell ) at the time of Creation in Genesis Account.


References and Sources


Many of the expressed ideas were taken from ENCODE The National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) that launched a public research consortium named ENCODE, www.AnswersInGenesis.com, and other respectful websites and research papers.

References
  • Dr. Alex McFarland. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/04/30/ten-reasons-millennials-are-backing-away-from-god-and-christianity.html
  • http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/04/30/ten-reasons-millennials-are-backing-away-from-god-and-christianity.html
  • “Evolution in medical school: Do we need more of it?” http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2013/04/a_movement_to_m.html.



  • Mike Riddle, “Can Natural Processes Explain the Origin of Life,” in The New Answers Book 2, Ken Ham, ed. (Master Books, 2008). See also www.answersingenesis.org/go/origin
  • The Image in Mind: Theism, Naturalism, and the Imaginations. Charles Taliaferro and Jil Evans, The Image in Mind: Theism, Naturalism, and the Imagination, Continuum, 2010, 224ppl. $130.00 (hbk), ISBN 9781847064820.
  •  http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/29978-the-image-in-mind-theism-naturalism-and-the-imagination/

 "I am a creationist and an evolutionist. Evolution is God's, or Nature's method of creation. Creation is not an event that happened in 4004 BC; it is a process that began some 10 billion years ago and is still under way." — Theodosius Dobzhansky, "Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution" (1973) /wiki/Nothing_in_Biology_Makes_Sense_Except_in_the_Light_of_Evolution
"Strangely enough, Marxist and Catholic philosophers joined forces to combat my activity. In fact, Catholic clergymen, even some bishops, are most prominent in defending evolution". (Prof. Giertych,1999). https://creation.com/professor-of-genetics-says-no-to-evolution

  • Evolution: No Chance in a Billion Years. https://answersingenesis.org/evidence-against-evolution/probability/evolution-no-chance-billion-years/

  • Censored Biology .Phil Johnson MCE- On the “the Miller-Urey experiments”



  • Information, science and biology

by Werner Gitt: http://creation.com/information-science-and-biology 
(No Junk DNA, sic): - Mobile DNA Elements: The Seeds of Organic Complexity on Earth.
All web page references accessed above were between April and May 2017

  •   State-of-the-art computer modeling of plate tectonics has demonstrated that the processes ... occur catastrophically over a drastically shortened timescale [Baumgardner 1994a, b, 2003].
  • Leslie Pray, Ph.D. © 2008 Nature Education 
    Citation: Pray, L. (2008) Transposons, or jumping genes: Not junk DNA? Nature Education 1(1):32 https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/Transposons-or-Jumping-Genes-Not-Junk-DNA-1211 
    (Accessed May 26, 2017) 
  • "And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.” Genesis 1:31.


  •   Table 2 bellow. Courtesy of Dr. Nathaniel T. Jeanson and Jeffrey P. Tomkins on May 11, 2017Human Origins from Ape-Like Primates or Fully Human People?https://answersingenesis.org/human-evolution/origins/human-origins-from-ape-like-primates-or-fully-human-people/

     
  • "A theory that can explain anything and everything, no matter how contradictory, really isn’t science". https://answersingenesis.org/big-bang/big-bang-the-evolution-of-a-theory/. Accessed Oct 4th, 2017.
  •  
  • Table 2. Factually erroneous evolutionary claims about human-primate ancestry

      Evolutionary Claim    		 Actual Data
    Human-chimpanzee genetic identity is 98-99% Actual genetic identity is only 88% (i.e., 400,000,000 DNA differences exist between the two species)
    Humans are genetically closer to apes than to other animal species, unequivocally demonstrating common ancestry Relative hierarchies are characteristics of design
    Human chromosome #2 arose via fusion of two ape-like chromosomes
    The purported “fusion” site is actually a functional DNA element in a human gene

    Gene order along chromosomes has no function, therefore shared gene order demonstrates common ancestry    		  Gene order along chromosomes does indeed perform a function
     Humans and chimpanzees shared genetic mistakes (e.g., pseudogenes)
    Pseudogenes appear to be functional DNA elements, not mistakes
    Humans possess the broken remnants of an ancient chicken gene (vitellogenin) No such remnant exists; instead the “fragment” appears to be a functional DNA element

Additional Refences 

"Fuzzy words." Words that evolutionists typically use when they have no observable evidence to support their claims. (Mike Riddle)

“In a recent issue of Science News magazine, for example, we find the first fuzzy words in the article's title: "Bubbles may have sheltered early life." Did you spot it? Yes, it's the phrase "may have."

In the second paragraph, we read: "Such a snug hideout could have shielded microbes from ultraviolet radiation." Right – the words "could have".

In the next paragraph, a geologist is quoted as saying that the work is "very plausible" – another way of getting you to accept the scientist's wishful thinking.

In the remaining paragraphs, we find two more "could haves", a "may have", a "perhaps", a "might have" and two instances of "appeared to be".
"If microbes survived in these pockets on early Earth, they could potentially have done so on other planets such as Mars.

"The words "if" and "potentially" should have set off the critical thinking alarm bells in our minds.

Contrary to this “story-telling” approach, the Bible avoids fuzzy words and phrases. “The Bible doesn't try to trick or deceive us. Its words are true because its Author is Truth and His words endure forever.”
http://www.creationmoments.com/radio/transcripts/caution-fuzzy-words-ahead
Accessed June 9th, 2017.

http://childrensmd.org/uncategorized/why-doctors-and-lawyers-homeschool-their-children-18-reasons-why-we-have-joined-americas-fastest-growing-educational-trend/http://childrensmd.org/uncategorized/why-doctors-and-lawyers-homeschool-their-children-18-reasons-why-we-have-joined-americas-fastest-growing-educational-trend/




Ocean Chemistry, Genetics and Biology http://www.logosresearchassociates.org/about

 http://members.iinet.net.au/%7Esejones/pattam01.html. Colin Patterson's address at the American Museum of Natural History, New York City, 1981, pages 1-5. Accessed August 25th, 2017.

Wells, 2002: Jonathan Wells, Darwinists Answer "Ten Questions" with Evasions and Falsehoods, 2002, http://www.discovery.org/a/1106

Darwinists Answer "Ten Questions" with Evasions and Falsehoods
Jonathan Wells - Discovery Institute- January 15, 2002
  "The NCSE introduces its answers to my Ten Questions by calling many of my claims "incorrect or misleading," and by maintaining that they are "intended only to create unwarranted doubts in students' minds about the validity of evolution as good science." The evasions and falsehoods listed above, however, make it clear that it is the NCSE's answers that are incorrect or misleading. If students have doubts about the scientific validity of evolution, their doubts are amply warranted not only by the systematic pattern of misrepresentations in biology textbooks, but also by the false and evasive statements the NCSE makes in defense of those misrepresentations.
Good science is the search for truth, and it searches for truth by comparing theories with the evidence. A good science education should present the evidence truthfully--especially the evidence for and against a theory as influential as Darwin's. Yet biology textbooks invariably present this evidence with a pro-Darwin spin, indoctrinating students rather than educating them. It seems that the National Center for Science Education, despite its title, wants students to inherit the spin". http://www.discovery.org/a/1106

  • "A theory that can explain anything and everything, no matter how contradictory, really isn’t science". www.answeringenesis.com



We Observe the Family values of  America Family Association
America Family Association



Copyright   Computer Integrations, Inc. ©, 2017
No part of this article may be reproduced or copied without the author’s exclusive permission

Fred Echeverria
MSc. Education
Ph.D (abd) Computers and Education

Originally published May 17th, 2017. Last Updated   Wednesday, July 12, 2017

at

Home School Services

Hawaii School of True Science Academy Providing Teaching & Tutoring Services for Home School Students in Maui       All STEM Su...